Welcome to my blog!

Meet the Author

Blessed with the best _ Alhumdulillah!a million times for every blessing in my life.

Looking for something?

Subscribe to this blog!

Receive the latest posts by email. Just enter your email below if you want to subscribe!

Wednesday, January 11, 2017

Quetta Gladiators sign title sponsorship deal with Jubilee Life

Quetta Gladiators, a Pakistan Super League (PSL) franchise, has signed title sponsorship deal with a leading private insurance firm for the second edition of the tournament starting in less than a couple of weeks time.

The signing ceremony between the two parties was witnessed by capacity crowd in the hall of Movenpick Hotel, Karachi, where it was held on January 30. The top management of the PSL franchise alongwith some of their players and coach Moin Khan, who is also a former Pakistan captain.

The Quetta Gladiators skipper, Sarfraz Ahmed, who is also the Pakistan T20 skipper and tipped to become the leader in all three formats in not too distant future, however, was unable to make it due to personal reasons.

Nadeem Omar, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Omar Associates (Pvt) Ltd, which owns Quetta Gladiators, was particularly pleased at signing the title sponsorship deal with Jubilee Life Insurance.

“Jubilee Life is a dynamic young corporate entity which takes pride in long term relationships. Our successive meetings with them over the past few weeks to finalize the matters reflected their positive approach,” he noted.

“Our squad has a lot of young faces who make up for their inexperience with their aggression and high level of commitment. We may have entered the inaugural PSL as the underdogs but our boys excelled in the field to storm into the final. Now our aim will be to bring home the trophy,” Nadeem Omar remarked.

He paid glowing tributes to Moin Khan, the coach of Quetta Gladiators, for having put the acts together so nicely, also acknowledging the services of Azam Khan, the manager besides complimenting Sarfraz Ahmed for leading by example.

Javed Ahmed, Managing Director, Jubilee Life Insurance, lavished Quetta Gladiators for emerging as a popular brand right away with their brilliant craftsmanship.

“Your team has worked wonders in a short span of time and we appreciate your brilliance. We look forward to working with you for a long time to achieve our mutual objective of putting Pakistan cricket on top of the world,” he observed.

The ceremony was also attended by the President of the Karachi City Cricket Association (KCCA), Prof Ejaz Ahmed Farooqui, and the Chairman of the Pakistan Veterans Cricket Association (PVCA), Fawad Ijaz Khan.


Saturday, December 31, 2016

نیا سال سب کو مبارک


ﺗﻮ ﺟﻮ ﻧﺌﮯ ﻋﯿﺴﻮﯼّ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﮧ ﺧُﻮﺵَ ﮬﻮﻧﺎ ﭼﺎﮬﺘﮯ ﮬﯿﮟ
ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍُﻥ ﮐﯽ ﺧُﻮﺷﯿﻮَﮞ ﮐﻮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﯿﮟ ﻟﮕﺎ سکتی، ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍُﻥ ﺳﺐ ﮐﻮ ﻣُﺒﺎﺭﮐﺒﺎﺩ ﺩﯾﻨﺎ ﭼﺎﮬﺘی ﮨﻮﮞ، ﺍُﻥ ﮐﯿﺴﺎﺗﮫَ ﻣﻞ ﮐﺮ ﮨﻨﺴﻮنگی ، ﮐﮭﮑﮭﻼﺅﮞ گی، ﺧﻮُﺵ ﮨﻮنگی ﮐﯿﻮﻧﮑﮧ
ﻣﯿﮟ ﺯﻧﺪﮦ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻮَﮞ ﮐﮯ ﺑﯿﭻَ رہتیﮬﻮﮞ، ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍُﻥ ﮐﯽ ﺧُﻮﺷﯽ ﮐﮯ ﻟﻤﺤﺎﺕَ ﮐﻮ ﺭَﺩّ ﻧﮭﯽ ﮐﺮﻧﺎ چاہتی،
ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍُﻥ ﮐﯿﺴﺎﺗﮫَ ﮬﻤﺪﺭﺩﯼ ﺑﮭﯽ رکھتیﮨﻮﮞ ﺟﻮ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﮐﻮ ﺧُﻮﺵ ﮬﻮﺗﺎ ﺩﯾﮑﮫّ ﺧُﻮﺵّ ﻧﯿﮟ ﮬﻮ ﺳﮑﺘﮯ،
ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍﯾﺴﮯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻮﺭﻭَﮞ ﮐﯿﺴﺎﺗﮫَ ﺑﮭﯽ ﮬﻮﮞ ﺟﻮ ﮐﺘﮯ ﮬﯿﮟ ﮐﮧ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣُﺤﺮﻡَ ﺳﮯ ﺷُﺮﻭﻉ ﮬﻮﺗﺎ ﮬﮯ،
ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍﯾﺴﮯ ﺻﺎﺣﺐّ ﻧﻈﺮّ ﮐﯿﺴﺎﺗﮫَ ﺑﮭﯽ ﮬﻮﮞ ﺟﻮ ﻟﻮﮔﻮﮞ ﮐﯽ ﮨﻨﺴﯽّ ﮐﮯ ﭘﯿﭽﮭﮯّ ﭼﮭُﭙﮯَ ﻏﻢَ ﮐﻮ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺗﺎﮌَ ﻟﯿﺘﮯ ﮬﯿﮟ، ﮬﺮ ﻗﮯّ ﮐﮯ ﭘﯿﭽﮭﮯّ ﭼﮭُﭙﯽَ ﮦ ﮐﻮ ﺟﺎﻥ ﻟﯿﺘﮯ ﮬﯿﮟ،
ﺍﻭﺭ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍُﺱ ﻣﺎﮞ ﮐﯿﺴﺎﺗﮫَ ﺑﮭﯽ ﮬﻮﮞ ﺟﺲ ﮐﺎ ﺑﯿﭩﺎ ﺍِﺱ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﮭﺮ ﻧﮯ ﮐﮯ ﺑﺠﺎﺋﮯ ﻋﺪﻡ ﮐﺎ ﺭﺍﮨﯽ ﺑﻦ ﮔﯿﺎ،
ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍُﺱ ﯾﺘﯿﻢَ ﮐﯿﺴﺎﺗﮫ ﺑﮭﯽ ﮬﻮﮞ ﺟﺲ ﮐﺎ ﺑﺎﭖَ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻣﺎﮞ ﺩﻭﻧﻮﮞ ﮨﯽ ﻧﯿﮟ ﺭﮬﮯ،
ﮨﺎﮞ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍُﺱ ﻣُﻔﮑﺮّ ﮐﯿﺴﺎﺗﮫَ ﺑﮭﯽ ﮬﻮﮞ ﺟﺴﮯ ﻓﮑﺮ ﮬﮯ ﮐﮧ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﯿﺖّ ﮔﺮﮮ ﮔﮍﮬﮯَ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮔﺮﻧﮯ ﺟﺎ ﺭﮬﯽ ﮬﮯ ﺍﻭﺭ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﭘُﺮﺳﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﯿﮟ،
ﺍﻭﺭ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍُﺱ ﭘُﺮﺍُﻣﯿﺪَ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﭼﺮﮮَ ﻭﺍﻟﮯ ﻧﻮﺟﻮﺍﻧﻮَﮞ ﮐﯿﺴﺎﺗﮫُ ﺑﮭﯽ ﮨﻮﮞ ﺟﻮ ﮐﺘﮯ ﮬﯿﮟ ﮐﮧ ﮨﺎﮞ !
ﺣﺎﻻﺕّ ﺑﺪﻟﯿﮟ ﮔﯿﮟ، ﮬﻢ ﺑﺪﻟﯿﮟ ﮔﯿﮟ، ﮬﻤﺎﺭﺍ ﻣُﻌﺎﺷﺮﮦَ ﺑﺪﻟﮯ ﮔﺎ، ﺍﻭﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﻟﮯ ﮔﺎ،
ﺍﻭﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﯽَ ﺍﺱ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﺷﮏ ﻧﯿﮟ ﮐﮧ ﯾﮧ ﺳﺐ ﮐُﭽﮫَ ﮨﻮﮔﺎ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﺳﮯ ﮬﻢ ﻋﻤﻠﯽ ﺟﺎﻣﮧَ ﭘﻨﺎﺋﯿﮟ ﮔﯿﮟ،
ﺍﭘﻨﮯ ﻋﻤﻞّ ﺳﮯ، ﺍﭘﻨﮯ ﺟﻨﻮﻥ ﺳﮯ، ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﭘﻨﯽ ﺳﻮﭺَ ﺳﮯ،
ﺑﺲ ﺳﻮﭺَ ﮐﻮ ﻣُﺜﺒﺖَ ﺭﮐﮭﯿﮟ ﺍﻭﺭ ﯾﺎﺩّ ﺭﮬﮯ ﻧﺌﮯ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮐﯽ ﺧُﻮﺷﯿﺎّﮞ ﻣﻨﺎﺗﮯ ﮬﻮﺋﮯ ﮐﺴﯽ ﮐﺎ ﺩِﻝّ ﻣﺖ ﺩُﮐﮭﺎﺋﯿﮯ ﮔﺎ !!!____

کہکشاں خان

Monday, December 26, 2016

Golden era of Pakistan snooker ends with Alamgir Shaikh’s tenure

Alamgir Anwar Shaikh, having completed a couple of successful four-year tenures as the President of the Pakistan Billiards & Snooker Association (PBSA), will not taking part in the upcoming elections of the national body due to take place on December 28.


In accordance with the National Sports Policy, which restrains any official from retaining the same slot for more than eight years, Alamgir Shaikh has not filed nomination for the quadrennial elections.

The PBSA, which is affiliated to the Pakistan Sports Board (PSB), has been hailed as one of the best performing sports federations of the country over the years, having produced positive results on a more consistent basis than any other sport, besides cricket.

The game of snooker, it may be recalled, was revived in a big way in 1988 when Ali Asghar Valika took up its leadership and went from strength to strength.

He not only changed the nomenclature of the governing body of cue sports from the Billiards Association of Pakistan (BAP), which was dormant for the preceding decades, to the Pakistan Billiards & Snooker Association (PBSA) but brought about a revolution which witnessed phenomenal growth for snooker in particular all over the country.

In a matter of years, Pakistan came to be recognized as one of the major snooker nations, enabling it to be a preferential venue for global and continental events.

Asghar Valika, whose administrative and organizational qualities earned him worldwide acclaim, quit the leadership of the PBSA in 2008, ironically to fulfill the obligations of the National Sports Policy.

His successor, Alamgir Shaikh, having worked with him for a long time in his team, sustained the momentum and built a stronger platform for cue sports during the next eight years which witnessed more activities at national and international levels.

Once again it’s the National Sports Policy, prompting another change of guard in the PBSA. The newly elected President, however, will be hard pressed to emulate the accomplishments of his last couple of predecessors, Asghar Valika and Alamgir Shaikh, both of whom are credited to have taken cue sports to very high level.


Saturday, December 24, 2016

Television: Best Friend or Worst Enemy of Your Kids?


Most of the people including kids love to watch television. Even if they are asked to quit watching it, they will still watch it. Some parents think of it as a useful device for their kids. In fact, they use it as an alternate when they are busy somewhere else. They bring educational DVDs so that their children could learn something positive while they are not present.


However, they forget the fact that a TV, merely, cannot fulfill the purposes of education their children need. By dragging their kids into digital life they forget about the ethics and practical education that their kids need in the early age of their lives.

Despite of the fact that children need guidance in the early stages of their childhood, they make toddlers watch different TV shows including cartoons, learning shows while parents are busy in their own issues. They somehow think a TV can replace them.


Now the question arises whether TV is good or bad for kids?


No wonder TV is a good source of learning for kids during the age of 6-15 but it also needs parental guidance (PG) so that children can really learn what was intended and do not get distracted


I personally believe, during the age 4-15 years kids get to learn new things and try to mimic everything they like or watch. So it is parents’ duty to keep an eye on their children’s activities and monitor which programs they watch.


There are some programs which are especially developed for kids. It is proven that the kids who watch educational and informative TV shows, perform better academically than those who do not watch them. These programs set children to a new way of learning things and at the same time keep the fun factor intact so that they enjoy the programs while watching.


Normally, kids have their own way of handling things. Though they could not practically learn a thing while watching it, but they get to know how to do it.


According to another study done by scientists, it was proven that watching cartoons help children in relieving stress. Hence, some preschoolers who actively watch TV programs get good grades and are less aggressive as compared to other kids.


However, watching excessive TV is harmful for the kids. Kinds in early age need to learn different languages and socialize with their peers to develop a balanced personality. However, watching excessive TV would not give them enough time to participate in any such activities. Not only that, it is harmful for their health and eyesight as children like to concentrate on their favorite characters and that’s why they try to get as near to their TV screens as they can.


Not only do they concentrate on their favorite characters, they adopt their habits. Now, a good program can lead such children’s mind to develop good routine whereas some animated, action and deceptive programs can spoil their minds. Children always try to skip their lunch and sleep, thinking that they will miss a special scene if they leave.


They try to follow their favorite characters who claim to “Save the World” by different abilities and powers they have.


As an example, I want to mention an incident that we heard few days ago. A 7-year-old kid got injured while jumping off of a high cabinet at kitchen thinking he will be invisible by imaginary wings or he would throw a net like Spider-Man did in his movie.


Children get involved in the activities of bullying other kids, they fight with the kids of their age or below to show that they have power to beat anyone. Moreover, the fact cannot be denied that they develop sexual interests before they come of age and oftentimes get into fights to impress girls as they see in different movies or cartoons. This is not only done by kids but some teenagers as well.


Additionally, watching excessive TV prevents kids as well as grownups from participating in different sports activities, music events, gatherings and art shows that develop a skill for their future.


According to a documentary, kids of age 2-5 spend 32 hours and kids of age 6-11 spend 28 hours a week in front of TV. Those who have TV in their bedrooms, spend 1.5 more hours per day than those who don’t. Most importantly, there are no rules in some families on watching TV


I believe, parents should keep an eye on their children while they watch TV, as some cartoon programs as well as movies can lead them to unethical activities particularly those which involve sexual harassment.


In conclusion, I want to state that watching TV is helpful for growing kids but it can play the negative role of spoiling them. Parental guidance is a must for every kid who does not know the difference between what’s right and what’s wrong. There should also be a timetable for children which should include a specific time for watching TV and other activities. Following these guidelines, kids can live a peaceful and happy life and do not get distracted.



Technology and Loneliness



Man is a social animal and loneliness can drive him crazy. To solve this problem, many new inventions have been made and one of them is mobile phone. Everyone has this electronic gadget with so many social networking applications in their pockets all the time. Whenever they are standing alone, waiting for someone or just feel lonely, they tend to use that device. We expect our loneliness to disappear by using it. So in order to do that, we update our profiles, we check others’ profiles and spend hours and hours scrolling through those screens in order to stay up-to-date.

But is this connection, that’s available to us 24/7 really satisfying us or leave us contended? According to many researches, the more the technology is advancing, the more the loneliness increases.

Loneliness is a complex and an unwanted feeling, usually unpleasant to us. It’s an emotional response to isolation or lack of companionship. These feelings can also lead to anxiety and if not treated in early stages, then depression. People have even committed suicides because of it.

Science states that a human brain can’t process more than 150 true relationships and we see our profiles, our contacts list, there are more than 150 people we call as friends.

Sir Nasim Nicholas Taleb said, “the difference between technology and slavery is that slaves are fully aware that they are not free”.



Technology is undoubtedly a fascinating phenomenon and it attracts us through small screens. It has enslaved us by presenting us some fantasies, by showing that technology is happy, active and optimistic.

Some of us might have also seen pictures on facebook, of our hands cuffed with cellphones. Isn’t that correct? Technology is enslaving us. We spend much of our times on these sites, in search of happiness or to feel up to date and in control, but it rarely is the case that we are happy after using it. We don’t feel good, sometimes not even close to it.

Marther luther king said, “the irony of our time is that we have guided missiles but misguided men”.

Technology is misguiding us by presenting us three illusions that we can focus on whatever we want, that we are always heard and that we are never alone. Man likes to be in control so he uses this technology to feel powerful. And we update our profiles and put statuses and share our feelings and think that we are always heard. And the third one, the craziest one, the one driving the generation crazy, is that we would never be alone. It is increasing the human misery.

We are chatting, messaging and in real life, we can’t even start the conversation. This technology takes us close to those who are far away and takes us away from those who are close to us.

In order to end the feeling of loneliness, we have entered in a paradox. We collect friends online like stamps, we replace real conversation with mare connection and we hide our vulnerable feelings to show that we are always happy.

If social media is a bridge between people then why most of the people feel lonely in general? Is this the paradox we are feeding on? Is this what makes everything, media interesting?

The Half Mother: A Review



Agony has a universal language. We as humans are implicated in each other’s sufferings. ‘The Half Mother”, Shahnaz Bashir’s debut novel is one of the few novels written by a Kashmiri himself that has successfully taken up the cause of depicting the anguish and sheer pain experienced by most of the mothers of the splendid valley in its true form. One of the purposes of the trend in Kashmiri writers of writing the book in English is obviously to reach extended audience. Additionally, they can portray before the same bigger audience the kind of traumas, affliction and sufferings that majority of Kashmiris have been facing till now at the hands of grossly immoral and barbaric Indian forces.


The novel circulates around the protagonist, Haleema, and her struggle to locate her only son Imran who was taken away by the relentless Indian Army. It may be mentioned here that the novel is a depiction of reality in Kashmir which is under illegal occupation of Indian forces since past several decades. So this is a story describing the plight of a Kashmiri family at the hands of cruel Indian forces i.e., a story of oppressed and the oppressors. There should be no question of neutrality on the part of any reader or reviewer. Our sympathies should be with the oppressed and not the oppressors.


The novel exquisitely narrates the story of Haleema who lost her mother at an early age. The setting of the novel is Natipora on the outskirts of Srinagar during 1990s when the war between Kashmiri freedom fighters and the Indian occupant forces started. This is the time when Haleema is living with her father Ghulam Rassol Joo (Ab Jan) and her only son Imran born out of her marriage that lasted only three months.


The Indian barbarians killed Ab Jan after which it was really hard for Haleema to make both ends meet while looking after Imran. The death of Ab Jan was not just the start of misery for Haleema. It was, in fact, the threshold of a painful journey into darkness with the forced disappearance of her only son, Imran, at the hands of Indians.


The disappearance of Imran was a significant blow to Haleema’s hopes for a better future. Imran was the only ray of hope for her. With his disappearance, she had been turned from ‘Mother’ into a ‘Half Mother’ – a mother with her son lost and with no knowledge as to if he was dead or alive. The uncertainty about the life of Imran was the real pain for her.


Every day she would move out in search of her lost son and visit jails and torture centers run by the Indians but to no avail. Cherishing her dear son’s memories, she would sing: “O crescent moon, why do you hide from me? Sulking as you are, why have you kept from me?” The writer has beautifully portrayed Haleema’s unending efforts to locate her son. In doing so, the writer has not only described the agony and sufferings of Haleema, but also has aptly exposed the brutalities, cruelty and indifference of Indian forces.



It was only hope of finding her son that kept Haleema alive. But her unsuccessful search at the end of every day was dealing a significant blow to her hopes and health. She continued to hope against hope of finding her son. She, in fact, live every day and died every day. With the passage of time, her physical and mental health kept on degrading.

She would constantly keep on looking towards the window with the hope that her son would just be come and knock at the door. But all her wishes and hopes kept on melting away. The writer has delicately described Haleema’s inner pains perhaps due to the fact that the writer himself belongs to Kashmir and must have observed many similar cases of sufferings at the hands of occupied forces.

This novel is a significant and successful effort to portray the extent of agonies of its protagonist, Haleema, to create wider awareness about Kashmiri struggle against illegitimate occupation. However, as I see, it does miss a passion of sacrifice for the Kashmiri struggle as a whole on the part of Haleema though both her father and son in reality died for the same cause.

If she had thought that her son was just one of many being martyred every day, she would not have gone through such trauma and would not have ended up her life as portrayed in novel. In fact, as we observe every day, most Kashmiris are out there for any sacrifice for their freedom. Such passion of sacrifice is totally absent in the character of the protagonist. A story parallel to this could have been written with message of sacrifice and hope for the freedom of Kashmir. But, perhaps, it is easier said than done. And Haleema was a ‘half mother’!

To sum up, the novel is an excellent effort to create wider awareness among the world community about the brutalities and relentlessness of Indian forces. The narrative and the story of the novel is such that one gets absorbed into it and is glued to it till the end. The language of the author is delicate. The author uses his own experience as a Kashmiri in creating the protagonist of this novel and has described the deep pain and suffering of the protagonist as if it is happening to him, and cruelties and inhumanity of the men in uniform.

However, the end of the novel does not seem to me as convincing. There could have been a better ending serving both to create awareness among the world community and to strengthen the struggle of Kashmiris for their freedom by giving a message to the Kashmiri audience that no matter what pain and suffering an individual Kashmiri might go through, he or she values his collective identity as Kashmiri more than anything else.

Daughter Remains A Daughter Her Whole Life




Daughters are a blessing from God. This is why Islam has given much importance to daughters. However, in our society, every class of people seem to have a desire for a male child. People want their first born to be a son. They think if a girl was born, it would be a burden for them.

They would have to marry her off and spend lots of money on her. She would use surname of her husband after marriage and if there was no male child then their family name will come to an end. Not only is a son considered an heir to the family name, he is considered an earning hand who will support the family in future.

On the other hand, families who own some property, fear their daughter will cause divide of their family riches and take her share to some other family. A son is their safe bet because the property stays within the family. 

However, no matter what their rationale is, the reality is that daughters are more loving, caring and obedient to their parents than a son. At the age when parents require care and affection, daughters take good care of their parents. They never prove to be a burden.

Sons, however,  usually kick their parents out and send them to some old-age homes. A son is a son till he gets his wife, but a daughter is a daughter for her whole life. 

It’s about time we change our faulty concept of giving dominant role to a male by default. Both the male and female children are a blessing of God and we should feel just that, blessed. Today, a daughter has proved that she is not less than a male in any field of life, she can earn money and support her family and do better than male.

Pakistani Youth Parliamentarians’ Study Visit to UK and Denmark


                             Group Photo of Pakistani Youth Parliamentarians

Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (PILDAT) organized a study visit to UK and Denmark that aimed to learn about the best democratic practices observed in a developed country. The study tour was of five days; one day in London, UK and remaining 4 days in Copenhagen, Denmark.
The day started off with a tour of the British Parliament, where we were briefed about the history of both the chambers, workings and the separation of powers between the House of Lords and the House of Commons.
Later on the same day we were told about the Britain’s exit from the European Union and the legal framework available to execute it. The Rt. Hon. Ms. Ann Taylor, the Baroness Taylor of Bolton, MP, and Baroness Liz Barker, MP spoke to us about the role of the House of Lords in the British Parliament.
They also highlighted various reform proposals regarding membership of the House of Lords, including introduction of a retirement age, a limited tenure, or having working peers instead of permanent members of the House of Lords.
We then visited the recently established Parliamentary Education Centre. We were communicated that the concept of the Parliamentary Education Centre is of a robust outreach to younger strata of the country’s population, including school-going children. In this regard, the Speaker of the House of Commons held a Skype session every Monday morning with visitors of the Parliamentary Education Center.
We then headed off to Copenhagen, Denmark where we were supposed to undergo study visit under the auspices of the DANIDA Fellowship Centre for four days on various aspects of Denmark’s governance, parliamentary and political system.
The five days stay in Copenhagen was intense but informative, very educating and thought provoking. We thoroughly studied, examined and discussed the dynamics of Danish Political System in different meetings and sessions. We got to interact and ask questions to Politicians of different parties, Members of Danish Parliament, Journalists, Mayors and Municipality members, Youth Activists, Government employees and Locals of Copenhagen city.
The first day in Denmark began with the briefings on the Danish Parliamentary System, Accountability Structures and Labor Policy. We were given an introduction to the DANIDA Fellowship Centre (DFC) by Ms. Maya. Following that, Professor Flemming Juul Christensen, gave us a brief introduction to Danish democracy and covered details on the unique demography of Denmark which has a population of 5.7 million.




Ms. Nanna, Consultant at the Supreme Audit Institution gave a detailed briefing on the Danish Supreme Public Accountability Institution. The last session of the day was conducted by the Member of Danish Confederation of Trade Unions (LO). He briefed us about the workings of the LO, which essentially is a confederation of Denmark’s 18 main labor unions.

The 2nd day was spent at the Danish Parliament, known as the Folketinget, having a detailed set of interactions on various aspects of its workings, including the Parliamentary practices, the Danish Constitution, the Committee System, etc.

In the meeting with Ms. Iben Tybjaerg, we were informed about the Folketing’s strategy and procedure for implementation and maintaining overall relationship with the European Union.

On the third day of Study Visit to Denmark, interactions regarding efforts for integrating ethnic minorities in Denmark, and a short debate session with representatives of Youth Wings of different political parties were carried out.
We then met with Ms. Rushy Rashid, and Mr. Zubair Butt Hussain. Both emphasized that Danish-Pakistanis, as with other immigrant communities, need to co-exist within the Danish society and be Danes.

The day ended with a visit to the Hammad bin Khalifa Civilization Centre, serving as a community centre and mosque for the Sunni Muslims in Copenhagen. We learnt of the organizational structure of the Centre and the efforts being undertaken to integrate Muslims into the Danish society.

On the final day of the YPP Study Visit, we had a rigorous set of interactions regarding all tiers of the Danish Education System. This included learning about the opportunities afforded by the system and some of the major challenges faced by it.

In the evening, we were hosted by the Honorable Ambassador of Pakistan to Denmark, Ambassador Masroor A. Junejo, for a dinner reception.

This study-tour turned out to be a great-learning involvement and surpassed by expectations by far. The political systems in the UK and Denmark are curiously good. As like Denmark and UK We need to have an effective audit and accountability system to counter corruption, ensure democracy, stability and build trust between the Governments and citizens.

To reinforce us as a nation and country we need health and educational reforms on immediate bases. Most importantly involving the locals of an area to deal with their minor problems. Decentralization is the most important thing we need in our current status. 

Donald Trump’s Pledge of Banning Muslims




Recently, Donald Trump was elected as a President of United States. Mr. Trump has pledged during his campaign that he would restrict the entry of Muslim immigrants to the US. This is for sure a step towards racism and goes against every building block of American principles on which the USA was founded. However, looking from different perspective, it might prove to be beneficial for Muslims.

It is all an accepted fact that Muslim countries are struggling behind in development when compared to Western Countries. Developed Western nations have good higher education facilities. Their systems are effective. Despite all irregularities, Eastern countries have good minds and talent but most of the talent is drained out to the Western Countries.Hence, by putting a ban on Muslims’s entry to the US, Mr. Trump will do a great service for them.



Muslims can have tremendous sources of income in their own countries. Our governments can help a lot in enticing such brains to work for their own country. All that’s needed is providing a competitive environment based on meritocracy.

In western Countries, wealth is shared by all while in Muslim Countries all the resources are treated as the personal property by the rulers. Instead of going to the West and serving those nations, the prospective immigrants should stay in their own countries.

They should struggle for the betterment of their own countries. Struggle to bring in true democratic rule. They should not let “monarchies” to spend the country’s wealth on themselves or to benefit west through banks. Instead they should create jobs in their own countries to make them strong.

Surprisingly, Muslim immigrants in the foreign countries turn out to be the critics of the lifestyle there. They become neither Western nor Eastern. In America, they face the same problem. They would enjoy and benefit a lot in their own countries when they would come back. So, Thankyou Donald Trump!

Social Media Likes – Are they Beneficial?



There are different types of posts on social media including videos, pictures and text in the form of memes, critiques, events, offers, quotes, updates etc. According to current affairs or current moods, people share or tag their friends in such posts to be a part of it. As in the documentary, Bonin Bough (V.P., Global Media, Mondelez Intl) said, “When kids like something it becomes part of who they are.”

Facebook is one of the big platform for advertisers. Big brands search ambassadors and volunteers for the expansion of their business. Advertisers also make respective groups for increment of the sale of their products. Some of the names of such groups are, Isloo buy and sell, Isloo camera buy and sell, Isloo Bazaar, and Buy and Sell (For whole Pakistan) etc. Different brands including clothing, food, cosmetics, home appliances, instruments etc use social media as a big means to sale their product and have as many followers as they can.

By followers, I mean a person who supports and admires a particular person or set of ideas. Followers admire the products and posts of their favorite page; brand/musician/public figure/others. They like and share their posts on their timelines.

Social media is also a platform for strugglers, which is a source of their fame these days. We see many artists, musicians, actors and comedians gathering their followers by merely asking them to like their stuff. They strive for a long period developing their fans. They entertain them in every possible way and in return, they ask them to LIKE & SHARE their stuff.

If we take an example from Pakistan, “Zaid Ali”, “Furqan Shykh”, “Rahim Pardesi”, “Uzair Altaf” (The tweet guy), “Shahveer Jaffery” etc are some of the famous bodies who used social media for their fame. They started making and uploading their videos and posts on their respective pages and kept on promoting them. Their videos are followed by a “Must Like & Share” statement.

Now the question is, “How can a single like give them enough fame?

The answer is, when you like a page/post on Facebook, it automatically gets in your friends’ newsfeed. If you have around 300 friends, almost 200 people out of them will see your activity and out of them 100-120 friends will like or share that post; who will have mutual interests with you and the process continue (The mentioned number may vary).

“The icon of this generation is the like button, the tweet button and the reblog button,” Said Bonin Bough in the documentary. Our generation wants to have as many likes on their profile picture as possible. “The profile picture is kind of how you want people to visualize you, you put your best before and the cover photo tells about your personality,” Said one of the guests in the documentary. Therefore, a “like” is one of the most important things in the life of today’s generation. They want hundreds of likes on their profile pictures and thousands are welcomed warmly as well, if possible.

Nowadays, “Chai Wala” (Arshad Khan) and “Desi Bombshell” (Shumaila; Behind the character) are most trending on social media; Facebook and Instagram. By most trending, I mean they are ranked high and one who is ranked high is criticized as well. Comparing these two, Arshad Khan, being a public figure received criticism. Many people think it is his destiny, many claim that there are many beautiful people in Pakistan other than him so why only him?

Many suggest that he was earning Halal until they invited him to showbiz and now his earning is not pure anymore and many think that Allah Almighty gives this rank to him and he deserves it. Different people have different point of views on social media and everyone is independent to show his like or dislike towards anything. Although Desi Bombshell received no criticism until now in fact, it is a source of entertainment for people.

According to 2011 Pew Research data, “Nearly 80% of American adults are online and nearly 60% of them use social networking sites.”



PTI’s Leader, Imran Khan, after elections was called, “The Prime Minister of Social Media” because he had a huge number of followers on social media but he did not get as much votes as he expected in elections. His followers kept supporting him in all his moves and announcements through social media. Imran Khan’s supporters are called “Youthiyaas” as he represents the youth of Pakistan. Nearly 85% of the youth supported Imran Khan in the cause of “Dharna” against government and election commission.

There is another social boy in the documentary named Tyler Oakley, who has hundreds of subscribers on YouTube. He makes random videos of his lifestyle about which he says, “I have made probably over 500 videos in which I talk about everything.” But wait a second, not everything but the things he likes. Social media lets him share his obsessions with the world.

He makes videos of different stuff around him like the date of buying his laptop, the cookie he ate, his backyard and none the less, his haircut. Another little boy made some videos of his skating skills and uploaded them on YouTube, along with another skating fellow he kept making videos and got famous. Usually, these stars merge their videos with other renowned stars and keep on expanding their followers.

After all, getting people all about something is a big business.

Take the issue of same sex marriage, as another example, if you are in favor of it and want the world to know, oreo was there to help, a cookie, which is two chocolate and a cream in the middle. They built it in a perspective that was so profound.

That one post alone had million likes, a million people took an action and all those who supported gay marriages or wanted to be a part of it, claimed, that they associate with that, they like that piece of content. That piece of content spoke them. That profound so big numbers and those numbers are extremely valuable.

Coming to my opinion, there is no such demerit of social media in the documentary but in reality, there are some demerits of using social sites excessively. The majority of young people (56 %) reported spending up to three hours a day on social media.

Dr. Douglas Gentile, Director of the Media Research Lab at Iowa State University reports, “Almost one out of every ten youth gamers shows enough symptoms of damage to their school, family, and psychological functioning to merit serious concern.” Most of all, it is disturbing their study and their concentration. Students may be in class, but their minds are on how many “likes” their picture got last night.

“Teens stay up to 12 or 1 AM scrolling down their newsfeed. They end up only getting four to five hours of sleep, which is definitely not enough to function properly through the day.” (Marwick, Boyd).

Teens are increasingly sharing personal information on social media sites, a trend that is likely driven by the evolution of the platforms teens use as well as changing norms around sharing. Teens are sharing more information about themselves on social media sites than they did in the past. Social media may provide an additional way to connect with others and form relationships. These relationships may result in a good term or may be a bad one.

Another issue of using social media excessively is the privacy issue. If we compare 2003 with 2016, a huge number of people have increased who have started uploading their pictures and videos on social media without any hesitation. Around 65% of people have started updating their hometowns, relationship statuses, institutions and date of births.

In conclusion, it is important for every parent to learn about internet and keep an eye on what their children do online. They should learn different softwares and be aware of what their children upload and when they are online. Parents should also take care of the emotions of their children; they should not tell their children that they condemn their behavior yet tell your child you are concerned about some of the changes you have seen in his or her behavior
')